d5sd5s
Engineering workflow example

Move from alert to evidence-backed triage faster.

Trace a production error, identify the likely change, and prepare a triage issue without giving the agent authority to modify production.

When a qualifying alert fires Reviewable deliverable Approval boundary

How this composition works

This workflow brings error context, repository history, issue tracking, and edge signals into one isolated investigation. The agent develops and records a hypothesis, links every source, and prepares the next action. Engineers retain control over code changes, deployments, and incident declarations.

01

Read the failure

Collect the error, trace, environment, and affected release context.

02

Inspect the likely change

Compare the failure window with commits and pull requests without modifying the repository.

03

Check service boundaries

Rule in or out edge configuration and traffic anomalies.

04

Prepare the triage issue

Create a structured issue only after the evidence and uncertainty are explicit.

Connected systems

These are the real product connectors composed for this example, each scoped to the credential permissions your workspace approves.

Optional skills

Where relevant, skills add reusable method and verification. The connectors and agent instructions remain the primary building blocks.

Try asking

Triage this Sentry alert
What changed before the failure?
Prepare an issue with the evidence

More examples for Engineering

Build a governed workflow like incident triage.

Tell us what your team repeats today. We will map the systems, approval boundaries, and first governed run with you.

Design a workflow